Graduation: What Does It All Mean In 2009?
M.D. Wright
5.16.09
Graduation is an exhilarating experience for anyone. For some, they are just glad to be done with an undergraduate degree. For others, they are proud and ecstatic, but at the same time, they know they are pursuing further education (personally, I am an academic for life) and yet others are expecting to find jobs waiting for them (or expected to have one sewn up prior to graduation and have not... yet) and are nervous because of the current economy/hiring practices of businesses in 2009.
I refuse to worry or fret. God has had my back for the past three years. No jokes. I haven't always been faithful or done right -- and I have no problem admitting to being a screw up at times -- but I don't worry about whether or not God is looking out for me. Before coming back to UNCG, I was making very good money, had everything with respect to material possessions and was able to pretty much do whatever I wanted, whenever I wanted. People who did not know me prior to 2006 do not know that; those who did, do know.
That all changed in 2006, when the demands on school and the failure of my businesses caused me to have to surrender EVERYTHING (including my way of doing things and trusting God FOR REAL, for real). So when it comes to post-graduate plans, that's really the deal. I'm applying to 15-20 FEDERAL JOBS -- those who have done KSAs for those know that is a monumental task.
Given that I am planning to get my Masters (either in Business Administration in some capacity or an MS in Journalism), Juris Doctorate and Ph.D., I am not exhaling. Sure, I am excited and happy about short-term prospects, and I always live in the moment, so I am trying to celebrate this for the next month or so ha. But in reality, I'm really reflective right now. I've come a long way like Virginia Slims. I've had to cut a LOT of people off -- some of whom posed as friends, but set me up for a fall(s), laughed when I was going through the worst in 2007 and 2008 and don't realize what they are bringing on themselves for doing so.
Nonetheless, here are my short-term plans:
The fact that none of my friends live in Greensboro and, while I've lived here longer than any other city I've lived in, this is not "home" for me. I have no ties here outside of my parents and a couple of relatives who are not even originally from here. I'm heading back to New York for good. I should correct myself, though. I do have friends in Greensboro, some aren't graduates yet, and I rarely see them or get a chance to hang with them. But I've got to move on. There are no jobs here and I have to reclaim my spot.
I'm going to head to New York on June 5. Hopefully, my friend's summer camp gig comes through as expected and I'll just chill on Staten Island this summer. Yes, I will definitely be in Harlem (you already know) every week just because.... well, I'm supposed to. I'll be out in Jersey quite a bit also. I'll be going to shows at the Garden, Yankee games, Met games, free concerts by quality artists out in Brooklyn and in the various different parks in the city, TNThursdays at Nevada's down in the East Village, heading upstate to see some friends and relatives, Connecticut a few times and Massachusetts and DEFINITELY out to Montauk to fish (Kyle, we're gonna be "on a boat"). All the while, I will be continuing to apply for federal jobs. If nothing comes through, I will begin my Masters' studies this fall full-time. Depending on how my real estate buddies work things out, I'll be moving into my own place (finally) in Harlem either down near Mt. Morris Park or up on the Hill or near City, in that general area. Either that or back out to Fort Greene where I also lived back in the day.
I have a few family gatherings that I am very excited about. My sister is heading back to Atlanta soon. If you're doing REAL things in music or film, you need to talk to her. SERIOUSLY. I'll shill for her for life. Not just because she's my sister, but because she's 10 times more talented than I am in music, film and the such like, and I'm no slouch.
We have a big family gathering at the roots of the tree down in Camden, NJ this July 4th. I'm looking forward to meeting some family members for the first time. Over/under that I'll meet one that I've seen around either in NC, NJ or NY? 42:1. Watch. Ha. But anyway, I am looking forward to all of that.
I love how God separated me from people lately. It helped me to lean on Him more and reflect. To be sure, you really do find out who your friends are (and realize that you only truly have 3-5 real ones at ANY one time at all stages of your life). The sooner you accept that as truth, the sooner you will get over people who show their asses and try to take you down on a regular basis.
I'm somewhat going to miss North Carolina, but my heart is always here -- much like it has been in New York while I've been there. I'll always be home in both places. But for now, and the next 15-20 years or so, I've got to be back to where I'm supposed to be.
Shouts to the following people -- we've got some shenanigans to partake in this summer:
Young DK
Young Lee
Young Tom
Ms. Shay
Sister Alicia Wu
'manita Chantal L.
Tiff B.
L. Boogie
Young Court Mitchell
My Cuz Prince
Nico Haze (whenever you finally come back to NY ha)
Raquel B. (will be in south Florida to beat your butt in Wii ha)
Jin
Mary1000, Mely down in PR
KOFI RA -- I'm gonna be out there before August 15. It is my goal.
YOUNG RODE, we're going to Disneyland.
If I left anyone off, get at me, I'm going to enjoy this summer HARDBODY (no homo).
Peace
As politically incorrect as I wanna be.
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
More NBA Referee/Cheating For Boston Escapades
More NBA Referee/Cheating For Boston Escapades
M.D. Wright
5.13.09
Where Amazing Happens (c), eh?
Let me run down a laundry list of infractions that have gone unchecked all playoffs:
1. First Round. Chicago Bulls vs. Boston Celtics. Game 5. Rajon Rondo pimp slaps Brad Miller, knocks a tooth out and leaves Miller bloodied. VIEW HERE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TzGrzs7-AI
NO FLAGRANT 1. NO FLAGRANT 2. They even waited for a second to even make a REGULAR FOUL CALL -- and before anyone disputes this, I was watching it live. The call was late. They were actually going to let this clown get away with that malicious foul. He made no attempt at the ball. It was just a cheap shot foul because the Celtics ganged up on Ben Gordon (triple teamed him, actually -- since he is known to kill teams at the ends of games with backbreaking three pointers) and left Miller a wide open lane. They panicked and were determined not to give up the easy bucket. Okay. But go for the ball, not the man's face. Then exaggerate his weight in the postgame interview (Rondo claims Miller is 290, he's 265... MAYBE) to further defend your actions. Somehow.
Meanwhile, Derek Fisher (rightfully) gets ejected for a forearm shiver and Rafer Alston gets ejected for... SLAPPING (softly, I might add) a guy in the back of the head (deservedly)?
Let's move on.
2. First Round. Chicago Bulls vs. Boston Celtics. Game 6. Rondo is at it again. Punches Kirk Hinrich http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5VkdP_I-XM. No ejection. No suspension. Guys have gotten suspended and assessed Flagrant 2 Fouls for less. I don't get it. Rondo has goaltended three or four shots in these playoffs that have not been called, by the way.
3. First Round. Chicago Bulls vs. Boston Celtics. Game 7. I have no video, because David Stern and his cronies made sure 1) TNT didn't even show a replay of the play itself and 2) subsequently, there IS no video online. But Glen "Big Baby" Davis chops Dwight Howard across the arm. No foul. Knocks the ball loose. Davis grabs the ball with BOTH FEET CLEARLY OUT OF BOUNDS. No call. The referee was standing RIGHT THERE WATCHING IT. I guess he was so amazed by things that he forgot to blow his whistle. The Magic had a chance to go down and cut the lead to 3, instead on the play Ed House gets a breakaway layup off Davis' "steal".
4. This isn't playoffs, but more Rondo bitchassness. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9wKL3y-rGU Notice he walks away, because Kobe was having NUNNADOT. ha.
5. Second Round. Orlando Magic vs. Boston Celtics. Game 5. Two things here. Well, actually three. Remember in the Chicago series, Ben Gordon shot an obvious 3 pointer that was called a 2. IN THE FIRST HALF. The refs changed it in the second half. Last night, in Game 5 of the ORL vs. BOS series, Ray Allen shoots a 2 (if you can't see anything between the white three point line and the white in a player's shoes, HE IS COUNTED ON THE LINE. The rules for officiating are clear. I have been an official in the past. I know this. The play was called a 3. They did not change it to a 2 -- BECAUSE IT WAS IN THE FIRST HALF AND THEY CAN'T "GO BACK"? WTF??? They just did that in the Chicago series! Does the NBA front office really think people are overlooking these incosistencies and this ruse to keep Boston in it?
Anyway, this play here typifies what has gone on all playoffs. No Boston player has been fined, suspended or even assessed Flagrant 2's; when Rondo, Perkins should each have at least one. This OBVIOUS airball -- which resulted in a 24 second violation, concluded with the referees huddling and OVERTURNING the call, even though none of them saw the ball touch the rim, nor did they go to replay. THE HELL? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=su6PxE0BOZg
M.D. Wright
5.13.09
Where Amazing Happens (c), eh?
Let me run down a laundry list of infractions that have gone unchecked all playoffs:
1. First Round. Chicago Bulls vs. Boston Celtics. Game 5. Rajon Rondo pimp slaps Brad Miller, knocks a tooth out and leaves Miller bloodied. VIEW HERE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TzGrzs7-AI
NO FLAGRANT 1. NO FLAGRANT 2. They even waited for a second to even make a REGULAR FOUL CALL -- and before anyone disputes this, I was watching it live. The call was late. They were actually going to let this clown get away with that malicious foul. He made no attempt at the ball. It was just a cheap shot foul because the Celtics ganged up on Ben Gordon (triple teamed him, actually -- since he is known to kill teams at the ends of games with backbreaking three pointers) and left Miller a wide open lane. They panicked and were determined not to give up the easy bucket. Okay. But go for the ball, not the man's face. Then exaggerate his weight in the postgame interview (Rondo claims Miller is 290, he's 265... MAYBE) to further defend your actions. Somehow.
Meanwhile, Derek Fisher (rightfully) gets ejected for a forearm shiver and Rafer Alston gets ejected for... SLAPPING (softly, I might add) a guy in the back of the head (deservedly)?
Let's move on.
2. First Round. Chicago Bulls vs. Boston Celtics. Game 6. Rondo is at it again. Punches Kirk Hinrich http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5VkdP_I-XM. No ejection. No suspension. Guys have gotten suspended and assessed Flagrant 2 Fouls for less. I don't get it. Rondo has goaltended three or four shots in these playoffs that have not been called, by the way.
3. First Round. Chicago Bulls vs. Boston Celtics. Game 7. I have no video, because David Stern and his cronies made sure 1) TNT didn't even show a replay of the play itself and 2) subsequently, there IS no video online. But Glen "Big Baby" Davis chops Dwight Howard across the arm. No foul. Knocks the ball loose. Davis grabs the ball with BOTH FEET CLEARLY OUT OF BOUNDS. No call. The referee was standing RIGHT THERE WATCHING IT. I guess he was so amazed by things that he forgot to blow his whistle. The Magic had a chance to go down and cut the lead to 3, instead on the play Ed House gets a breakaway layup off Davis' "steal".
4. This isn't playoffs, but more Rondo bitchassness. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9wKL3y-rGU Notice he walks away, because Kobe was having NUNNADOT. ha.
5. Second Round. Orlando Magic vs. Boston Celtics. Game 5. Two things here. Well, actually three. Remember in the Chicago series, Ben Gordon shot an obvious 3 pointer that was called a 2. IN THE FIRST HALF. The refs changed it in the second half. Last night, in Game 5 of the ORL vs. BOS series, Ray Allen shoots a 2 (if you can't see anything between the white three point line and the white in a player's shoes, HE IS COUNTED ON THE LINE. The rules for officiating are clear. I have been an official in the past. I know this. The play was called a 3. They did not change it to a 2 -- BECAUSE IT WAS IN THE FIRST HALF AND THEY CAN'T "GO BACK"? WTF??? They just did that in the Chicago series! Does the NBA front office really think people are overlooking these incosistencies and this ruse to keep Boston in it?
Anyway, this play here typifies what has gone on all playoffs. No Boston player has been fined, suspended or even assessed Flagrant 2's; when Rondo, Perkins should each have at least one. This OBVIOUS airball -- which resulted in a 24 second violation, concluded with the referees huddling and OVERTURNING the call, even though none of them saw the ball touch the rim, nor did they go to replay. THE HELL? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=su6PxE0BOZg
For Patrick Ewing Fans: Vintage Video
For Patrick Ewing Fans: Vintage Video
M.D. Wright
5.13.09
Just posting these for old times' sake. When the Garden was loud. And we were proud (well, REAL Knick fans still are, regardless). Vintage Pat Ewing.
Enjoy:
http://e-town.itgo.com/PatrickEwing/Media/media.htm
For Wally (Mike Walczewski) fans, note his "PAAAAAAA-trick Ewing" call after the made shots that REAL Knick fans remember and love so much.
M.D. Wright
5.13.09
Just posting these for old times' sake. When the Garden was loud. And we were proud (well, REAL Knick fans still are, regardless). Vintage Pat Ewing.
Enjoy:
http://e-town.itgo.com/PatrickEwing/Media/media.htm
For Wally (Mike Walczewski) fans, note his "PAAAAAAA-trick Ewing" call after the made shots that REAL Knick fans remember and love so much.
Monday, May 11, 2009
Graduation & The Thereafter...
Graduation & The Thereafter...
(R. Bonifacio, M.D. Wright)
5.11.09
A friend of mine (and in the future, check the bottom of my posts -- because I will give publishing credit to the people who inspire a blog or who have asked for me to write something that was on their minds and they weren't desirous to write it) suggested I do this, so here goes:
As most of you know, UNC Greensboro graduates this Friday, May 15, 2009 at 10:00 am at the Greensboro Coliseum. For those who have received invitations from me (or my family regarding the BBQ following Commencement) you can ignore this.
I am asking that each of my friends on here donate $10 (or whatever is in your hearts to give) toward my getting back on my feet, paying for exams/application fees and rent, while I continue my career search this summer.
If you decide to do so, my information is as follows:
Michael D. Wright
1212-B Oakland Avenue
Greensboro, NC 27403
336.340.5506
mdwright212@gmail.com
I also have PayPal, but that is a bit too tedious.
Saludos,
MDW
(R. Bonifacio, M.D. Wright)
5.11.09
A friend of mine (and in the future, check the bottom of my posts -- because I will give publishing credit to the people who inspire a blog or who have asked for me to write something that was on their minds and they weren't desirous to write it) suggested I do this, so here goes:
As most of you know, UNC Greensboro graduates this Friday, May 15, 2009 at 10:00 am at the Greensboro Coliseum. For those who have received invitations from me (or my family regarding the BBQ following Commencement) you can ignore this.
I am asking that each of my friends on here donate $10 (or whatever is in your hearts to give) toward my getting back on my feet, paying for exams/application fees and rent, while I continue my career search this summer.
If you decide to do so, my information is as follows:
Michael D. Wright
1212-B Oakland Avenue
Greensboro, NC 27403
336.340.5506
mdwright212@gmail.com
I also have PayPal, but that is a bit too tedious.
Saludos,
MDW
Current Rumination
Current Rumination
M.D. Wright
5.11.09
For the churched out there, especially for those of us who have served over ministries and seen the inner workings of "church" that most people don't see or know about, I want to pose a thought.
Does anyone see the disturbing trend that is underway; the one where pastors over a particular church act like front runners, only associating with the elite professionals, shucking, jiving, shilling for them, meanwhile blatantly ignoring (and in some cases, as I have witnessed...) putting those down who aren't doctors, lawyers, politicians, etc.?
It's not a big deal to me, but I wonder if anyone else notices this.
Makes you wonder what some of them will do when the people who they put down, never tried to help when it was apparent they weren't doing so well -- end up experiencing big success and become the very "elite" that they so commonly side with.
Just a rumination.
M.D. Wright
5.11.09
For the churched out there, especially for those of us who have served over ministries and seen the inner workings of "church" that most people don't see or know about, I want to pose a thought.
Does anyone see the disturbing trend that is underway; the one where pastors over a particular church act like front runners, only associating with the elite professionals, shucking, jiving, shilling for them, meanwhile blatantly ignoring (and in some cases, as I have witnessed...) putting those down who aren't doctors, lawyers, politicians, etc.?
It's not a big deal to me, but I wonder if anyone else notices this.
Makes you wonder what some of them will do when the people who they put down, never tried to help when it was apparent they weren't doing so well -- end up experiencing big success and become the very "elite" that they so commonly side with.
Just a rumination.
Friday, May 8, 2009
Purpose
Purpose
M.D. Wright
5.8.09
I'm all about purpose in every area of my life. I don't believe things "just are". In my attempts to understand why things have gone the way they have the past three years (good and uncomfortable), I like to ponder the purpose for which both pleasant and uncomfortable things occur. Now that I have had TONS of solitude (I've probably stayed in and been alone more in the past three years than I had been in the 27 years cumulatively prior. I NEVER sat still, and I always had a group of people around me at all times. I just had that persona that drew people. I was/always have been droll, deadpan/dry and for those who really know me, everything opposite of what my stoic exterior greets those who don't know me.
Another thing I have pondered, as I have had to cut a good number of people out of my life (and continuing to do so as I type) I want to know why people are in my life. Every last one of them.
Whether we know each other from UNCG, Greensboro in general, Henderson, Staten Island, Brooklyn, Harlem, or whether we connected on Facebook -- what purpose do you believe you serve in my life? Or I in yours?
I'd like to hear from everyone on my friends list on Facebook regarding this.
Thanks & Regards,
Peace
-- mdw
M.D. Wright
5.8.09
I'm all about purpose in every area of my life. I don't believe things "just are". In my attempts to understand why things have gone the way they have the past three years (good and uncomfortable), I like to ponder the purpose for which both pleasant and uncomfortable things occur. Now that I have had TONS of solitude (I've probably stayed in and been alone more in the past three years than I had been in the 27 years cumulatively prior. I NEVER sat still, and I always had a group of people around me at all times. I just had that persona that drew people. I was/always have been droll, deadpan/dry and for those who really know me, everything opposite of what my stoic exterior greets those who don't know me.
Another thing I have pondered, as I have had to cut a good number of people out of my life (and continuing to do so as I type) I want to know why people are in my life. Every last one of them.
Whether we know each other from UNCG, Greensboro in general, Henderson, Staten Island, Brooklyn, Harlem, or whether we connected on Facebook -- what purpose do you believe you serve in my life? Or I in yours?
I'd like to hear from everyone on my friends list on Facebook regarding this.
Thanks & Regards,
Peace
-- mdw
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Thoughts On Young Edward House
Thoughts On Young Edward House
M.D. Wright
5.7.09
You know, I'm really getting tired of this guy's act. He has Kevin Garnett and Doc Rivers over there gassing him up like he's Reggie Miller or something. This guy needs to pipe down. He acts like he's a big shot, when he's a SUPER LITE version of Vinnie Johnson aka "The Microwave". Vinnie never jumped around like a chihuahua in heat and getting in the opposing teams' faces taunting and having conniptions whenever the referees whistle him for obviously committed fouls. This bum was in the NBA doldrums until Ainge rescued him off the scrap heap. Dear GOD.
Then last night, when my dude Skip (Rafer Alston) SONS House for taunting and throwing an elbow, House wants to say ALL OF A SUDDEN that Skip was playing "Bush League" basketball.
Yeah, and gallivanting around trash talking after you hit WIDE OPEN (of which 3/4 of his shots are) shots, whining about calls like someone on their way to the electric chair and then acting as if you've done something when only 8 of your points were scored on Skip (who actually outscored you head to head) isn't Bush League.
Dear God I wish Skip would've knocked his headband clear off. I can't stand House (OR NANCY BALLPLAYERS LIKE HIM).
Nor his JOHN STOCKTON PROTEGE backcourt mate, Rajon Rondo who is about the dirtiest point guard in the league (about to surpass Chris Paul for that distinction).
You already know how I feel about the Celtics from being a lifelong Knick fan and watching how the refs cheated for them so blatantly in the 80s. Now they're doing it again.
M.D. Wright
5.7.09
You know, I'm really getting tired of this guy's act. He has Kevin Garnett and Doc Rivers over there gassing him up like he's Reggie Miller or something. This guy needs to pipe down. He acts like he's a big shot, when he's a SUPER LITE version of Vinnie Johnson aka "The Microwave". Vinnie never jumped around like a chihuahua in heat and getting in the opposing teams' faces taunting and having conniptions whenever the referees whistle him for obviously committed fouls. This bum was in the NBA doldrums until Ainge rescued him off the scrap heap. Dear GOD.
Then last night, when my dude Skip (Rafer Alston) SONS House for taunting and throwing an elbow, House wants to say ALL OF A SUDDEN that Skip was playing "Bush League" basketball.
Yeah, and gallivanting around trash talking after you hit WIDE OPEN (of which 3/4 of his shots are) shots, whining about calls like someone on their way to the electric chair and then acting as if you've done something when only 8 of your points were scored on Skip (who actually outscored you head to head) isn't Bush League.
Dear God I wish Skip would've knocked his headband clear off. I can't stand House (OR NANCY BALLPLAYERS LIKE HIM).
Nor his JOHN STOCKTON PROTEGE backcourt mate, Rajon Rondo who is about the dirtiest point guard in the league (about to surpass Chris Paul for that distinction).
You already know how I feel about the Celtics from being a lifelong Knick fan and watching how the refs cheated for them so blatantly in the 80s. Now they're doing it again.
My Life... And The Mountains Corollary
My Life... And The Mountains Corollary
M.D. Wright
5.7.09
Everyone is familiar with peaks and valleys. It is an easy analogy/parable to use to describe an otherwise complex situation. Complex being the status and function of my life after pretty much spending the first 16 years at the peak ha.
I was going well, escalating Mt. Everest gradually and methodically. No slips, no missed steps, and then springtime comes and the ice caps begin to melt. That sends melted snow and mud down the cliff, which cause me to lose my footing (the Erythrodermic Psoriasis throughout 9th-12th grade -- nightmares in high school; kept me from playing basketball for the school team and relegated me to running track and immersing myself in music erstwhile). I spent the rest of my teen years sliding down the proverbial cliff.
Nevertheless, ever resilient, I rebounded. God healed me of the skin disorder and I began asserting myself with my job and starting my own small business. I also began to speculate in real estate at age 21. I had it all: cars, nice job, healthy savings, potential real estate holdings, looks, nice clothing, able to travel frequently, fine dining and meeting influential people who were willing to help me achieve my dreams. I was on my way back up that rough side of the mountain.
Segue.
I figured going back to school (I left Long Island in '98) in 2004 would help solidify things for me. I had an informal education through one on one mentoring from a local millionaire and a family friend who not only is a minister in the church (and his wife is an elder in the church as well), but is a real estate broker also. I learned a lot from these people; further building upon the sturdy foundation that my parents had set with the vast knowledge that I had acquired from them.
HOWEVER, as I continued to build (co-founding a non-profit organization in 2004 -- ironically built and designed to help people who were in the situation I ended up in as a RESULT of it not getting off the ground), another avalanche occurred, which threatened to knock me back down the mountain again. This time it knocked me completely down the mountain to the deepest valley. I had never fallen this low; not even in high school, because I still played sports -- just not basketball and football like I would have (and excelled at, just ask my classmates and coaches). I had everything. A new 350Z car, which was my dream, in Sept. 2004, three streams of income set up, networking and helping other people get started on businesses (many of whom forgot I existed when I was going through the worst of times) and encouraged many others.
For people who did not come along until 2005 or 2006, they have no idea from whence I came. Instead of them attempting to one-up me, they would be wise to check with me to find out what to look out for in their blind spots and also other things to know in order to achieve and sustain success. Instead, many of them -- having never even been through anything in life to this point -- are doling out dry advice as if my situation is ever so simple. I don't wish anything on anyone, but I really want all of these people to remember their "advice" and not run to their parents to bail them out of financial binds when trials inevitably come their way.
I know I have not slipped and fallen this many times for naught. I'm not a quitter. I'm a maverick and a warrior. I'm ever-resilient and will find a lesson in every failure. Besides, every "failure" presents an opportunity for greater success. I embrace it. I learn more every time. This time, I plan to get to the top of the mountain, stay there, and teach others the arduous journey and help them along the way as a tour guide would for amateur mountain climbers.
M.D. Wright
5.7.09
Everyone is familiar with peaks and valleys. It is an easy analogy/parable to use to describe an otherwise complex situation. Complex being the status and function of my life after pretty much spending the first 16 years at the peak ha.
I was going well, escalating Mt. Everest gradually and methodically. No slips, no missed steps, and then springtime comes and the ice caps begin to melt. That sends melted snow and mud down the cliff, which cause me to lose my footing (the Erythrodermic Psoriasis throughout 9th-12th grade -- nightmares in high school; kept me from playing basketball for the school team and relegated me to running track and immersing myself in music erstwhile). I spent the rest of my teen years sliding down the proverbial cliff.
Nevertheless, ever resilient, I rebounded. God healed me of the skin disorder and I began asserting myself with my job and starting my own small business. I also began to speculate in real estate at age 21. I had it all: cars, nice job, healthy savings, potential real estate holdings, looks, nice clothing, able to travel frequently, fine dining and meeting influential people who were willing to help me achieve my dreams. I was on my way back up that rough side of the mountain.
Segue.
I figured going back to school (I left Long Island in '98) in 2004 would help solidify things for me. I had an informal education through one on one mentoring from a local millionaire and a family friend who not only is a minister in the church (and his wife is an elder in the church as well), but is a real estate broker also. I learned a lot from these people; further building upon the sturdy foundation that my parents had set with the vast knowledge that I had acquired from them.
HOWEVER, as I continued to build (co-founding a non-profit organization in 2004 -- ironically built and designed to help people who were in the situation I ended up in as a RESULT of it not getting off the ground), another avalanche occurred, which threatened to knock me back down the mountain again. This time it knocked me completely down the mountain to the deepest valley. I had never fallen this low; not even in high school, because I still played sports -- just not basketball and football like I would have (and excelled at, just ask my classmates and coaches). I had everything. A new 350Z car, which was my dream, in Sept. 2004, three streams of income set up, networking and helping other people get started on businesses (many of whom forgot I existed when I was going through the worst of times) and encouraged many others.
For people who did not come along until 2005 or 2006, they have no idea from whence I came. Instead of them attempting to one-up me, they would be wise to check with me to find out what to look out for in their blind spots and also other things to know in order to achieve and sustain success. Instead, many of them -- having never even been through anything in life to this point -- are doling out dry advice as if my situation is ever so simple. I don't wish anything on anyone, but I really want all of these people to remember their "advice" and not run to their parents to bail them out of financial binds when trials inevitably come their way.
I know I have not slipped and fallen this many times for naught. I'm not a quitter. I'm a maverick and a warrior. I'm ever-resilient and will find a lesson in every failure. Besides, every "failure" presents an opportunity for greater success. I embrace it. I learn more every time. This time, I plan to get to the top of the mountain, stay there, and teach others the arduous journey and help them along the way as a tour guide would for amateur mountain climbers.
NBA/NHL Officiating 2009 Playoffs Version
NBA/NHL Officiating 2009 Playoffs Version
(M.D. Wright, J. Albert)
5.7.09
DEAR GOD.
That's all I can say. The officiating in both sports has been CRIMINAL all decade, really. And the crescendo has occurred right under our noses in the playoffs in both the NBA and NHL.
In Game 3 of the Western Conference Semifinals in the NHL, the Detroit Red Wings had a great chance to take hold of the series and go up 2-1 overall. Two horrific calls/decisions were made on the part of the referees. Initially, a very poor interference call stopped a rally for the Wings and with a little over a minute remaining in the game, Marian Hossa had a goal taken away because the referee didn't see the puck and called the play dead. SHEESH. Game ends 2-1. Series 2-1 in favor of the Anaheim Ducks.
The 4th quarter of Game 1 of the Orlando vs. Boston Eastern Conference Semifinals in the NBA -- and ALL of Game 2 of that same series has been a sad joke. The way the refs allowed Rondo and Pierce to simply launch their bodies into defenders and the Celtics go to the line 26 times in the 2nd half AFTER NOT SHOOTING ANY IN THE FIRST -- while not changing the way they played -- is beyond me. I would have no problem with this except the refs did not call Boston for the same fouls when Orlando was on offence.
Then, in Game 2, I saw several non-called fouls on the Celtics when Magic players were pulled blatantly, grabbed, fouled across the arms -- highlighted by Glen "Big Baby" aka Fat F--- Davis RAKING Dwight Howard about the arms for a "steal". This wasn't the worst part of the play. Not the fact that it was not called, not the fact that Eddie House (who I now hate) got a layup off the "steal" but get this:
DAVIS HAD THE BALL IN HIS HANDS WITH BOTH FEET CLEARLY OUT OF BOUNDS. The referee was standing right there.
NO CALL.
For people who are 30 and older (or if you are able to remember the 80s Celtics at the old Boston Garden well enough) were having flashbacks of the Bird, Parish, McHale, Ainge, Johnson Celtics who feasted off cheating referees like this on their way to three titles. This is why I hate Boston. I'm having flashbacks to the 80s.
Wings fans are going to revolt if they lose that series to the overmatched DUCKS. DEAR GOD.
(M.D. Wright, J. Albert)
5.7.09
DEAR GOD.
That's all I can say. The officiating in both sports has been CRIMINAL all decade, really. And the crescendo has occurred right under our noses in the playoffs in both the NBA and NHL.
In Game 3 of the Western Conference Semifinals in the NHL, the Detroit Red Wings had a great chance to take hold of the series and go up 2-1 overall. Two horrific calls/decisions were made on the part of the referees. Initially, a very poor interference call stopped a rally for the Wings and with a little over a minute remaining in the game, Marian Hossa had a goal taken away because the referee didn't see the puck and called the play dead. SHEESH. Game ends 2-1. Series 2-1 in favor of the Anaheim Ducks.
The 4th quarter of Game 1 of the Orlando vs. Boston Eastern Conference Semifinals in the NBA -- and ALL of Game 2 of that same series has been a sad joke. The way the refs allowed Rondo and Pierce to simply launch their bodies into defenders and the Celtics go to the line 26 times in the 2nd half AFTER NOT SHOOTING ANY IN THE FIRST -- while not changing the way they played -- is beyond me. I would have no problem with this except the refs did not call Boston for the same fouls when Orlando was on offence.
Then, in Game 2, I saw several non-called fouls on the Celtics when Magic players were pulled blatantly, grabbed, fouled across the arms -- highlighted by Glen "Big Baby" aka Fat F--- Davis RAKING Dwight Howard about the arms for a "steal". This wasn't the worst part of the play. Not the fact that it was not called, not the fact that Eddie House (who I now hate) got a layup off the "steal" but get this:
DAVIS HAD THE BALL IN HIS HANDS WITH BOTH FEET CLEARLY OUT OF BOUNDS. The referee was standing right there.
NO CALL.
For people who are 30 and older (or if you are able to remember the 80s Celtics at the old Boston Garden well enough) were having flashbacks of the Bird, Parish, McHale, Ainge, Johnson Celtics who feasted off cheating referees like this on their way to three titles. This is why I hate Boston. I'm having flashbacks to the 80s.
Wings fans are going to revolt if they lose that series to the overmatched DUCKS. DEAR GOD.
Monday, May 4, 2009
Random Inspirational Thoughts
Random Inspirational Thoughts
M.D. Wright
5.4.09
Those of you who know me best know I am always thinking. This is sometimes detrimental, because it is hard to shut my mind off when I should be sleeping. But as a thinker and an entrepreneur, this is what I do. I was ruminating on some things a few minutes ago while in the john and I thought about an excellent way to continue to leave a legacy in my family (on all sides, father and mother's families). I believe I will be in position to initiate this within 3-5 years. Five years maximum.
To encourage education, entrepreneurship and service among my future children and younger cousins, I will commit to the following:
$10,000 for every Bachelors degree received.
$25,000 for every Masters degree received.
$50,000 for every other postgraduate (JD, Ph.D, Pharm. D., etc.)
$100,000 to fund the start of every law firm, financial consulting practice and medical-related clinic.
Why not? It is the way the blue bloods do it.
M.D. Wright
5.4.09
Those of you who know me best know I am always thinking. This is sometimes detrimental, because it is hard to shut my mind off when I should be sleeping. But as a thinker and an entrepreneur, this is what I do. I was ruminating on some things a few minutes ago while in the john and I thought about an excellent way to continue to leave a legacy in my family (on all sides, father and mother's families). I believe I will be in position to initiate this within 3-5 years. Five years maximum.
To encourage education, entrepreneurship and service among my future children and younger cousins, I will commit to the following:
$10,000 for every Bachelors degree received.
$25,000 for every Masters degree received.
$50,000 for every other postgraduate (JD, Ph.D, Pharm. D., etc.)
$100,000 to fund the start of every law firm, financial consulting practice and medical-related clinic.
Why not? It is the way the blue bloods do it.
Sunday, May 3, 2009
Greensboro, North Carolina: What's Wrong With Living Here & Why Greensboro Cannot Retain It's Humongous College Student Potential Workforce
Greensboro, North Carolina: What's Wrong With Living Here & Why Greensboro Cannot Retain It's Humongous College Student Potential Workforce
M.D. Wright
5.3.09
There is an interesting dynamic that exists in Greensboro, North Carolina. Greensboro has a reputation; not a positive one, amongst Greensboro natives, transplants from other states for work or college students who come to study at the 11 schools in the area.
For years, there was no nightlife to speak of in Greensboro. The "Downtown" area was a ghost town for many years. I hate to compare anything to New York, but I must say that without any major sports teams, no nightlife and nothing that appeals to 20/30-somethings who aren't married or have children, what purpose does this city serve for those who would even consider living here long-term?
Mind you, the population is over 250,000.
There are cities all up and down the eastern seaboard from Portland, Maine to Miami that boast more night life than Greensboro does. And to prove that this boredom, malaise and relative (I say relative, because there are those who are homeless and no education) hopelessness that exists in Greensboro is ENDEMIC to Greensboro, just look at the only two cities that out-populate Greensboro in North Carolina: Raleigh and Charlotte.
Raleigh as boomed in the past ten years. Charlotte's population has tripled since 1980. Neither city is short on things to do. Why? Because they CATER to the demographic that they claim they want to retain in their cities. Charlotte is very cosmopolitan; it appeals to upwardly mobile college graduates with two or more post-graduate degrees, middle-upper management/VP types and the new entrepreneurs in the southeast.
Raleigh appeals to every techie (and concurrently, every nurse, chemist, dentist or any other person in medicine in the southeast, with NC State, Duke Hospital, UNC Hospital and then UNC and Duke as school choices -- which are in and of themselves major draws.
Who does Greensboro appeal to?
Fifty something Empty Nesters, Jerry Springer viewers who like to sit around and have children while collecting WIC and other Social Security benefits?
Ask 90% of the recent college graduates from NC A&T, UNCG, Bennett, Guilford, GTCC, High Point Univ., WSSU, etc. and they unanimously want to leave here as soon as possible. This is what is driving me back to New York, which is where I wish I had never left in the first place. Going back 4-5 times a year and spending every summer Uptown is not the same as being there year-round and having things to do.
As I mentioned before, there are several universities here. A potentially large workforce. The problem? So few jobs. Everyone claims to be hiring at all times, but they rarely do. The Moses Cone Hospital network is huge, but if you're not an LPN, CNA, RN or CRN, forget about it with them. If you're not in administration in the university system somehow, forget about it. Even if you have several degrees. If anything, that might over qualify you. Sheesh.
The only thing here is customer call (i.e. abuse hot line) centers and Hack Agencies (read: Collections). Who, in their right mind (and wants to sleep at night) would do such work as harassing people into paying a collections account, when they themselves probably have a couple in collections? DEAR GOD.
Greensboro needs to get it together and stop operating like a Mom & Pop country store, before it ends up BECOMING ONE.
The city needs better public transportation, a light rail system (and for Stephen's sake, with the taxes that are levied here, this is not far-fetched) and to lure more businesses here. Greensboro is very spread out, but the great majority of the non-minimum wage jobs are in the northwestern corridor of the city.
Lying at the confluence of two major interstate highways (I-40/I-85), and 30 miles from one that brings people from gettin' it in Ohio (I-77) and Virginia, along with just being 75 miles from I-95, this city should be as large and vibrant as Atlanta.
You tell ME what's wrong with this picture...
I'll welcome any thoughts.
M.D. Wright
5.3.09
There is an interesting dynamic that exists in Greensboro, North Carolina. Greensboro has a reputation; not a positive one, amongst Greensboro natives, transplants from other states for work or college students who come to study at the 11 schools in the area.
For years, there was no nightlife to speak of in Greensboro. The "Downtown" area was a ghost town for many years. I hate to compare anything to New York, but I must say that without any major sports teams, no nightlife and nothing that appeals to 20/30-somethings who aren't married or have children, what purpose does this city serve for those who would even consider living here long-term?
Mind you, the population is over 250,000.
There are cities all up and down the eastern seaboard from Portland, Maine to Miami that boast more night life than Greensboro does. And to prove that this boredom, malaise and relative (I say relative, because there are those who are homeless and no education) hopelessness that exists in Greensboro is ENDEMIC to Greensboro, just look at the only two cities that out-populate Greensboro in North Carolina: Raleigh and Charlotte.
Raleigh as boomed in the past ten years. Charlotte's population has tripled since 1980. Neither city is short on things to do. Why? Because they CATER to the demographic that they claim they want to retain in their cities. Charlotte is very cosmopolitan; it appeals to upwardly mobile college graduates with two or more post-graduate degrees, middle-upper management/VP types and the new entrepreneurs in the southeast.
Raleigh appeals to every techie (and concurrently, every nurse, chemist, dentist or any other person in medicine in the southeast, with NC State, Duke Hospital, UNC Hospital and then UNC and Duke as school choices -- which are in and of themselves major draws.
Who does Greensboro appeal to?
Fifty something Empty Nesters, Jerry Springer viewers who like to sit around and have children while collecting WIC and other Social Security benefits?
Ask 90% of the recent college graduates from NC A&T, UNCG, Bennett, Guilford, GTCC, High Point Univ., WSSU, etc. and they unanimously want to leave here as soon as possible. This is what is driving me back to New York, which is where I wish I had never left in the first place. Going back 4-5 times a year and spending every summer Uptown is not the same as being there year-round and having things to do.
As I mentioned before, there are several universities here. A potentially large workforce. The problem? So few jobs. Everyone claims to be hiring at all times, but they rarely do. The Moses Cone Hospital network is huge, but if you're not an LPN, CNA, RN or CRN, forget about it with them. If you're not in administration in the university system somehow, forget about it. Even if you have several degrees. If anything, that might over qualify you. Sheesh.
The only thing here is customer call (i.e. abuse hot line) centers and Hack Agencies (read: Collections). Who, in their right mind (and wants to sleep at night) would do such work as harassing people into paying a collections account, when they themselves probably have a couple in collections? DEAR GOD.
Greensboro needs to get it together and stop operating like a Mom & Pop country store, before it ends up BECOMING ONE.
The city needs better public transportation, a light rail system (and for Stephen's sake, with the taxes that are levied here, this is not far-fetched) and to lure more businesses here. Greensboro is very spread out, but the great majority of the non-minimum wage jobs are in the northwestern corridor of the city.
Lying at the confluence of two major interstate highways (I-40/I-85), and 30 miles from one that brings people from gettin' it in Ohio (I-77) and Virginia, along with just being 75 miles from I-95, this city should be as large and vibrant as Atlanta.
You tell ME what's wrong with this picture...
I'll welcome any thoughts.
Men... And Church
Men... And Church
M.D. Wright
5.3.09
I have had discussions lately with both men and women (mostly those who wonder why men continue to avoid going to church regularly, if at all).
The answer(s) is/are both simple and complex, but there aren't many. Here they are, from what I have been able to decipher from the guys I know and from my own personal experience after leaving the church I went to for over 15 years in Greensboro.
1. They don't have a relationship with Jesus Christ in the first place.
There are guys who promise a "good church girl" the night before (usually after they consensually engaged in illicit activity -- and yes, I'm calling some of y'all out, because I CAN and I KNOW) that he will go to church with her the next day in order to appease her. He may go a time or two, but if she doesn't poke and prod and continue to press him about going, he won't. Why else would someone go to church if they have not the proper purpose for going in mind in the first place?
2. They have wandered from God if they are already saved.
This actually isn't all that common, because many of the guys who go to church consistently have what is best described as an off-and-on relationship with God to begin with. They just attend church out of rote, but they're not really active nor effective because of the aforementioned reason. The ones who usually stop going or never go to begin with and have wandered from God have been in rebellion and disobedience for some time before they actually stop attending. That, or they see an influx of poisonous spirits that infiltrate every ministry and see other vile things up close if they were involved in heading a ministry or assisting a pastor, elder or some other clergy. This happens quite a bit more often and explains why some guys abruptly stop going altogether.
3. The apparent embracing of the homosexual spirit that has engulfed many of the upcoming generation of young adult men -- while shunning Apostle Paul-like men who have not abdicated their kingly thrones as men.
I cannot account for how often this has happened. I have heard it expressed MANY times, however. And most people in church know fully well that from the music ministry down to other ministries in the church that overtly gay, unconsciously feminine or just flat out boys and young men who are around 99% of the time and therefore have become effeminate have dominated the male populace in most church congregations in the United States. It's not a regional thing.
Side Note: I was close with a great number of my cousins on all sides of my family growing up; 2/3 of the ones I was around most of the time were girls. I'm not effeminate in the least. So using that as an excuse as to why so many of these boys act like this in church now is ludicrous.
SEGUE
4. The church seems content with playing to peoples' emotions and not dealing with reality and truth. Yes, emotion IS part of the worship order. God ordained it that way. After all, He gave us emotions as an accompaniment to the physical, spiritual and logical senses He instilled in us when it comes to understanding His Word and His entire being. However, far too often there is constant pandering to the emotional, hoopin' and hollerin', shouting that is not steeped in any real truth or purpose, but just something reminiscent of a scene of women watching Sex & The City or an episode of Desperate Housewives. This emotional appeal is naturally going to go over most men's heads, while appealing fully to women, as they dwell on the emotion far more often than men do. Most men require and desire substantial truth manifested in evidence (I know, I know, Hebrews 11:1) before the emotional appeals from the pulpit are going to have any effect.
For all that, most of them can get their emotional jollies by watching ball games, fights, playing sports, racing cars or doing whatever it is most of them do when they DON'T go to church.
Notice this isn't a worldwide problem -- but almost endemic to the United States. The church doesn't deal in truth or TRUE Holy Spirit works. The latter being the ultimate issue.
M.D. Wright
5.3.09
I have had discussions lately with both men and women (mostly those who wonder why men continue to avoid going to church regularly, if at all).
The answer(s) is/are both simple and complex, but there aren't many. Here they are, from what I have been able to decipher from the guys I know and from my own personal experience after leaving the church I went to for over 15 years in Greensboro.
1. They don't have a relationship with Jesus Christ in the first place.
There are guys who promise a "good church girl" the night before (usually after they consensually engaged in illicit activity -- and yes, I'm calling some of y'all out, because I CAN and I KNOW) that he will go to church with her the next day in order to appease her. He may go a time or two, but if she doesn't poke and prod and continue to press him about going, he won't. Why else would someone go to church if they have not the proper purpose for going in mind in the first place?
2. They have wandered from God if they are already saved.
This actually isn't all that common, because many of the guys who go to church consistently have what is best described as an off-and-on relationship with God to begin with. They just attend church out of rote, but they're not really active nor effective because of the aforementioned reason. The ones who usually stop going or never go to begin with and have wandered from God have been in rebellion and disobedience for some time before they actually stop attending. That, or they see an influx of poisonous spirits that infiltrate every ministry and see other vile things up close if they were involved in heading a ministry or assisting a pastor, elder or some other clergy. This happens quite a bit more often and explains why some guys abruptly stop going altogether.
3. The apparent embracing of the homosexual spirit that has engulfed many of the upcoming generation of young adult men -- while shunning Apostle Paul-like men who have not abdicated their kingly thrones as men.
I cannot account for how often this has happened. I have heard it expressed MANY times, however. And most people in church know fully well that from the music ministry down to other ministries in the church that overtly gay, unconsciously feminine or just flat out boys and young men who are around 99% of the time and therefore have become effeminate have dominated the male populace in most church congregations in the United States. It's not a regional thing.
Side Note: I was close with a great number of my cousins on all sides of my family growing up; 2/3 of the ones I was around most of the time were girls. I'm not effeminate in the least. So using that as an excuse as to why so many of these boys act like this in church now is ludicrous.
SEGUE
4. The church seems content with playing to peoples' emotions and not dealing with reality and truth. Yes, emotion IS part of the worship order. God ordained it that way. After all, He gave us emotions as an accompaniment to the physical, spiritual and logical senses He instilled in us when it comes to understanding His Word and His entire being. However, far too often there is constant pandering to the emotional, hoopin' and hollerin', shouting that is not steeped in any real truth or purpose, but just something reminiscent of a scene of women watching Sex & The City or an episode of Desperate Housewives. This emotional appeal is naturally going to go over most men's heads, while appealing fully to women, as they dwell on the emotion far more often than men do. Most men require and desire substantial truth manifested in evidence (I know, I know, Hebrews 11:1) before the emotional appeals from the pulpit are going to have any effect.
For all that, most of them can get their emotional jollies by watching ball games, fights, playing sports, racing cars or doing whatever it is most of them do when they DON'T go to church.
Notice this isn't a worldwide problem -- but almost endemic to the United States. The church doesn't deal in truth or TRUE Holy Spirit works. The latter being the ultimate issue.
Monday, April 27, 2009
Thoughts On The Swine Flu Epidemic (Potential Pandemic)
Thoughts On The Swine Flu Epidemic (Potential Pandemic)
M.D. Wright
4.27.09
My initial thoughts are always centered around HYGIENE. I know how pigs are processed and all, but SHEESH. How much does the FDA know (or play a role in) this spreading? What does the CDC and WHO know? Hmmm. I read a headline today that said "CDC prepares for Swine Flu in the U.S. as if it is a pandemic".
Oh.
Usually, as a cynic - when the government puts out ominous lines like that, I know things are worse than they're letting on. And I'm not blaming the government organizations. Not in the least. I just know that they don't want to cause mass hysteria by telling EVERYTHING that they know about the situation. It's scary.
First of all, people in Mexico are falling ill like flies these days. I have a friend studying abroad down there. They're out of school and relegated to living like people being quarantined from a leprosy outbreak. Dear God.
Now I am hearing they have found 30 plus cases in the US. And out of all places, two different boroughs in New York City (Bronx, Queens). Sheesh. Do I need to go back to New York, with the way stuff like this can easily spread with seemingly 1 billion people per square mile? LOL nah, I'm not going to let this SARS mess keep me from moving back. However two big issues here:
1. Even though this is a VIRUS, there is another trend at play here. I had to do some reading for my Biology class this weekend. One of the essays was regarding bacteria and anti-biotics. There has been a decline in production of new anti-biotics in the past 30 years; whereas there were dozens found between the 1930s and 1970s. Not only that, but they are being over prescribed, abused and used for purposes other than those for which they were prescribed. As a result of all this, anti-biotics have lost their effectiveness. Now, and in the future, these new bacterium and viruses are going to be resistant against these antibodies and anti viruses. We had better watch out and create more vaccines and such.
2. PEOPLE NEED TO WASH THEIR HANDS. I get so friggin' tired of people sneezing in the kitchen when they're cooking and not covering their mouths or going to another room to let that shit subside. And what has happened to people washing their hands? There used to be a time when you were petrified to have someone catch you leaving the bathroom without washing your hands. ESPECIALLY if you did so after losin' weight. DEAR GOD. Guys are bold now. I can't speak for women, but I've heard from my female friends that they're just as nasty.
Everywhere I go, UNCG, public restrooms at ball games, professional companies for interviews and what not -- it's the same thing. Everyone thinks their stuff is clean, so they don't wash their hands after fiddling with it (no homo) in the bathroom. SHEESH. WASH YOUR HANDS. The professionals at the CDC are saying that is the best way to combat Swine Flu (and everything else that is killing people -- all because these nasty buzzards don't want to take 10 seconds and wash fecal matter and smegma off their hands!)
If I see another guy casually blow up the bathroom while I'm in the stand-up urinal... look in the mirror, do the Jeff Hornacek to their face -- NOT wash their hands, and walk out, I swear I'll never give another handshake in my life. I already don't shake hands with anyone who isn't related to me or at least one of my boys or trusted acquaintance (I know some of them niggas don't wash their hands, but hey, if I get sick off them, I know who to bludgeon). Now I'm gonna have to resort to wearing blue masks and giving everyone the fist pounds that Michael Jordan started in the mid 90s (and now everyone's doing).
M.D. Wright
4.27.09
My initial thoughts are always centered around HYGIENE. I know how pigs are processed and all, but SHEESH. How much does the FDA know (or play a role in) this spreading? What does the CDC and WHO know? Hmmm. I read a headline today that said "CDC prepares for Swine Flu in the U.S. as if it is a pandemic".
Oh.
Usually, as a cynic - when the government puts out ominous lines like that, I know things are worse than they're letting on. And I'm not blaming the government organizations. Not in the least. I just know that they don't want to cause mass hysteria by telling EVERYTHING that they know about the situation. It's scary.
First of all, people in Mexico are falling ill like flies these days. I have a friend studying abroad down there. They're out of school and relegated to living like people being quarantined from a leprosy outbreak. Dear God.
Now I am hearing they have found 30 plus cases in the US. And out of all places, two different boroughs in New York City (Bronx, Queens). Sheesh. Do I need to go back to New York, with the way stuff like this can easily spread with seemingly 1 billion people per square mile? LOL nah, I'm not going to let this SARS mess keep me from moving back. However two big issues here:
1. Even though this is a VIRUS, there is another trend at play here. I had to do some reading for my Biology class this weekend. One of the essays was regarding bacteria and anti-biotics. There has been a decline in production of new anti-biotics in the past 30 years; whereas there were dozens found between the 1930s and 1970s. Not only that, but they are being over prescribed, abused and used for purposes other than those for which they were prescribed. As a result of all this, anti-biotics have lost their effectiveness. Now, and in the future, these new bacterium and viruses are going to be resistant against these antibodies and anti viruses. We had better watch out and create more vaccines and such.
2. PEOPLE NEED TO WASH THEIR HANDS. I get so friggin' tired of people sneezing in the kitchen when they're cooking and not covering their mouths or going to another room to let that shit subside. And what has happened to people washing their hands? There used to be a time when you were petrified to have someone catch you leaving the bathroom without washing your hands. ESPECIALLY if you did so after losin' weight. DEAR GOD. Guys are bold now. I can't speak for women, but I've heard from my female friends that they're just as nasty.
Everywhere I go, UNCG, public restrooms at ball games, professional companies for interviews and what not -- it's the same thing. Everyone thinks their stuff is clean, so they don't wash their hands after fiddling with it (no homo) in the bathroom. SHEESH. WASH YOUR HANDS. The professionals at the CDC are saying that is the best way to combat Swine Flu (and everything else that is killing people -- all because these nasty buzzards don't want to take 10 seconds and wash fecal matter and smegma off their hands!)
If I see another guy casually blow up the bathroom while I'm in the stand-up urinal... look in the mirror, do the Jeff Hornacek to their face -- NOT wash their hands, and walk out, I swear I'll never give another handshake in my life. I already don't shake hands with anyone who isn't related to me or at least one of my boys or trusted acquaintance (I know some of them niggas don't wash their hands, but hey, if I get sick off them, I know who to bludgeon). Now I'm gonna have to resort to wearing blue masks and giving everyone the fist pounds that Michael Jordan started in the mid 90s (and now everyone's doing).
Sunday, April 26, 2009
New York Football Giants - 2009 NFL Draft Roundup
New York Football Giants - 2009 NFL Draft Roundup
M.D. Wright
4.26.09
Here are my thoughts about the NFL Draft in 2009 for the New York Football Giants:
JERRY REESE IS THE BEST GM IN THE NFL.
No wait. Really -- he is. But instead of summarizing my thoughts with that line, I will not be a douche and will expound.
We addressed a lot of our holes either through this draft (or free agent pickups -- i.e. the SS position), so here they are in order.
1. At #29 in the first round, the Giants selected WR Hakeem Nicks out of North Carolina. I had been high on this guy all year in 2008; especially during UNC's Meineke Car Care Bowl game vs. West Virginia where he made this spectacular catch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2ikDsi-DJA. Expected by Jerry. Great pick. Didn't expect Nicks to fall this far, though. If we hadn't gotten Nicks, I would've been after WR Kenny Britt (taken next by Tennessee) FROM?! Rutgers. Those guys came to my church out in New Jersey after their 11-2 season in 2007 ha. Britt's a cool guy.
2. Our 2nd round pick was OLB Clint Sintim out of Virginia. I don't know much about him; but again -- I don't need to know. Jerry Reese drafted him. He obviously will play strongside and shift over when Kiwanuka puts both hands on the ground. This guy is purported to be an animal. We need this. Chase Blackburn was a WASTE at strongside last year. With Boley at WLB, our weak link is now Pierce haaaaaaaa.
3. Our other 2nd round pick was used on an offensive lineman: William Beatty out of Connecticut. I know nothing about him. A value pick. We're playing with the house's money after getting this pick for Shockey last year. Fills a need for line depth.
4. Our first 3rd round pick was a DIAMOND IN THE ROUGH. WR Ramses Barden out of Cal Poly San Luis Obispo (as me and my boy Tony used to mock back in high school: "CAL POLY SLOW"). This guy is 6'6" 235 lbs. Sort of like Plaxico Burress minus the bad choices. He's fast. He has glue for hands. Eli needs a tall player or he'll throw 27 INTs this year. WE USED THE IGGLES OF ALL TEAMS TO LAND BARDEN. Holy Steven.
5. The other 3rd round pick was TE Travis Beckum out of Wisconsin. More value. We don't even need a TE with THE BOSS and Michael Matthews out there, but any help we can get to add depth and a special teams player is good. House's money with an extra 3rd round pick.
6. The 4th round pick was RB Andre Brown out of NC State. He's a masher. I saw a little of this guy. Teams will walk away from Giants games this year with blood from their mouths after dealing with Jacobs and Brown (along with whiplash from watching Bradshaw run by them ha).
7. Rhett Bomar was the 5th round pick. We don't need a QB. No risk here. We got this pick from New Orleans as compensation for them taking Shockey and his attitude off our hands. We now have Eli, Carr, Woodson and this Bomar at QB. Someone's gotta go.
8. The last two picks were a 6th and 7th round tandem of CBs to add depth at the position and for special teams. DeAndre Wright (New Mexico) and Stoney Woodson (South Carolina); neither of whom I know anything about. But since I trust Jerry, our secondary is much better than it was last year; with MORE SPEED.
I'm completely satisfied.
M.D. Wright
4.26.09
Here are my thoughts about the NFL Draft in 2009 for the New York Football Giants:
JERRY REESE IS THE BEST GM IN THE NFL.
No wait. Really -- he is. But instead of summarizing my thoughts with that line, I will not be a douche and will expound.
We addressed a lot of our holes either through this draft (or free agent pickups -- i.e. the SS position), so here they are in order.
1. At #29 in the first round, the Giants selected WR Hakeem Nicks out of North Carolina. I had been high on this guy all year in 2008; especially during UNC's Meineke Car Care Bowl game vs. West Virginia where he made this spectacular catch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2ikDsi-DJA. Expected by Jerry. Great pick. Didn't expect Nicks to fall this far, though. If we hadn't gotten Nicks, I would've been after WR Kenny Britt (taken next by Tennessee) FROM?! Rutgers. Those guys came to my church out in New Jersey after their 11-2 season in 2007 ha. Britt's a cool guy.
2. Our 2nd round pick was OLB Clint Sintim out of Virginia. I don't know much about him; but again -- I don't need to know. Jerry Reese drafted him. He obviously will play strongside and shift over when Kiwanuka puts both hands on the ground. This guy is purported to be an animal. We need this. Chase Blackburn was a WASTE at strongside last year. With Boley at WLB, our weak link is now Pierce haaaaaaaa.
3. Our other 2nd round pick was used on an offensive lineman: William Beatty out of Connecticut. I know nothing about him. A value pick. We're playing with the house's money after getting this pick for Shockey last year. Fills a need for line depth.
4. Our first 3rd round pick was a DIAMOND IN THE ROUGH. WR Ramses Barden out of Cal Poly San Luis Obispo (as me and my boy Tony used to mock back in high school: "CAL POLY SLOW"). This guy is 6'6" 235 lbs. Sort of like Plaxico Burress minus the bad choices. He's fast. He has glue for hands. Eli needs a tall player or he'll throw 27 INTs this year. WE USED THE IGGLES OF ALL TEAMS TO LAND BARDEN. Holy Steven.
5. The other 3rd round pick was TE Travis Beckum out of Wisconsin. More value. We don't even need a TE with THE BOSS and Michael Matthews out there, but any help we can get to add depth and a special teams player is good. House's money with an extra 3rd round pick.
6. The 4th round pick was RB Andre Brown out of NC State. He's a masher. I saw a little of this guy. Teams will walk away from Giants games this year with blood from their mouths after dealing with Jacobs and Brown (along with whiplash from watching Bradshaw run by them ha).
7. Rhett Bomar was the 5th round pick. We don't need a QB. No risk here. We got this pick from New Orleans as compensation for them taking Shockey and his attitude off our hands. We now have Eli, Carr, Woodson and this Bomar at QB. Someone's gotta go.
8. The last two picks were a 6th and 7th round tandem of CBs to add depth at the position and for special teams. DeAndre Wright (New Mexico) and Stoney Woodson (South Carolina); neither of whom I know anything about. But since I trust Jerry, our secondary is much better than it was last year; with MORE SPEED.
I'm completely satisfied.
Movie Reviews/General Thoughts
Movie Reviews/General Thoughts
M.D. Wright
4.26.09
I'm going to try to keep this brief. I want to review two movies that I have watched the past two nights and then tie in some things that I have encountered both in the recent past and throughout my 20s (as I recount).
Last night, I was hanging with a good friend and we went to see "Obsessed" (along with "Earth", for my class -- but that is immaterial in this post). I had seen the trailer and previews, so I pretty much knew the basic premise of the movie before going in. I do not have a high opinion of Beyoncé on the big screen, but I went in with an open mind, rather than having it made up to rip her as some of the reviewers did. However, I did find myself saying "expected" and turning to my friend as I had flashbacks to being stalked back in the day.
I won't spoil the movie, so I won't delve into the plot and specifics. Nevertheless, two things really bugged me all throughout this movie (and the other one that I will briefly touch upon): the idea that 1) White women are stone crazy about Black men and will go to any lengths to land one and 2) These movies don't do anything to erase the stereotype that Black women have bad attitudes -- which are many times, uncalled for.
Side note: Beyoncé actually did a pretty good job in this role.
Ali Larter, who played the stalker/psycho in the movie also had a hand in perpetuating a common stereotype of White women that is floating around nowadays: "they are only after Black men for sexual escapades and nothing more". Whatever. Just like all Black women don't have nasty attitudes. Generalizations just do not work. I sat with my friend (Black female) and immediately next to two 20-something White females who squirmed and winced when touchy scenes passed by. Of course, this particular theatre was packed with hoodrats who were just there to see "B." whoop someone's ass and that's it. Even when Beyoncé's character was out of line for not believing her husband (played by Idris Elba), I said "expected", but at the same time, I would have loved to have seen her keep her composure instead of reacting "typically".
By the way, for anyone who has already seen the movie, does anyone find it ODD that Beyoncé refers to their home as HER house when I ain't seen her work a minute in this movie. DEAR GOD.
Segue.
The same with "Not Easily Broken". The movie started kind of slow, and it was very good throughout. But after one of the kids' passes away, his mother, played by a single White mother, began putting the subtle moves on the Black woman's father. The expected ensued. But this is when I began to think to myself: WHAT IS THE PROBLEM HERE...? Where did this disconnect REALLY TRULY stem from?
I get tired of hearing Black women talk about "well, we're so accustomed to so and so and how they approach/treat us" as an excuse for acting the way they generally do. For those to whom this does not apply, you know not to get upset. If you get upset by what I say, then it applies to you.
Why, if "women's intuition" is so REAL, can't women truly tell a sincere man apart from one who is "just like all the others"? It's all BS. They know the difference. And given that fact, why am I being made to pay for the mistakes of others? Do I pop off and treat every woman I meet as a "bitch" because most of the women I've dealt with or entered into relationships with were slimy, reptilian, bloodsucking, selfish golddiggers who only cared about what they could get from me? No. Everyone gets a clean slate. And enough of the "well, we're so accustomed to our fathers, brothers, uncles not being there, so we have to be the men in the family". Okay, true, the Black community has its ills. That is one that is well-chronicled. HOWEVER, know when to put that BS on the back burner. When you are dealing with a man to whom that does not apply, cease and desist with the balderdash excuses to act like an ass. PERIOD. End of discussion. I'm sick of it.
But back to my main point about "Not Easily Broken", there are two trends playing out in the 2000s that are severely disturbing to me. First, the whole "Miss Independent"/"Got My Own" phenomena. Rubbish. Women who talk like that get defriended off my friends' list on Facebook and summarily dismissed. NO ONE IS AN ISLAND; and trying to prove one's worth to spite an entire gender is just foolish. Just because you've CHOSEN (key word) to deal with a bunch of sloughs doesn't mean you need to parade around and tell the world how much you don't need a man. He doesn't NEED you either, but he WANTS you (and I don't mean the slouch ass niggas, either). God created us to relate with one another and feed, serve, help and support one another physically and spiritually, not to flaunt our material rubbish around as a show of one's own efficiencies. How UNattractive is it to hear a woman banter about this, even if she does have her own things and doesn't need a man to provide them for her? What do you want me to do, provide a drummer's rim shot for you? Goodness gracious sakes alive, enough with this nonsense already.
My other thought about this point is the by-product of all this: the "me-first" (second, third and twentieth) mentality about marriage, children and so forth. Not all women are cut out to be housewives. Indeed, housewives have TOUGH lives; but it is not demeaning (no matter what brainless feminist zealots have led many to believe) or beneath one to do so. On the contrary, God made nurturing both children and the family unit as a whole such a noble thing that ONLY a woman is equipped to properly do so. Think about that. How is it that something God deems the highest of NOBILITY all of a sudden regarded as beneath or less-than? And please save the "you don't understand patriarchal society and the history of male oppression". Bullshit. I'm a Sociologist. Don't go there.
My thing is, in this movie, this woman was all about her career, trying to be something she's not, living above her means and trying to make people think things about her that were more lofty than they actually were. Who wants to be with someone like that? If you say yes, defriend me. NOW.
She didn't want to have a child because it would "get in the way of her career". WHAT.
Meanwhile, because her husband decided to... get this... GIVE BACK TO THE YOUTH BY COACHING, he's a less-than and also-ran who is worthless to her. Here we go. A social-climber, me-first, all about her career and status type who will run off a PERFECTLY good man (with a nasty attitude to boot) because he's not trying to keep up with the mythical Joneses.
One thing that I did like about her character (played by Taraji P. Henson) is that she redeems herself by doing something MANY women do not do (and drive me nuts by doing so; including some from my own personal past) and that's ADMITTING that she was wrong. That was like the icing on the cake, the cherry on top and putting the jello in the fridge (as Chick Hearn used to say) for me. A guy can be 100% sincere and honest, but if he's with a woman who never admits when she's wrong, 9 times out of 10 he's going to cheat or she's going to leave him for Joe Social Climber the 3rd. My problem with this generation of women (to whom this applies, not the ones who have it figured out and know whether they're supposed to be in the corporate arena because they've been called to do it and not those who do it just to compete with men and try to one up their OWN boyfriends/husbands -- that shit is BEYOND annoying) is that everything is about job prestige, money/wealth, status and material possessions. I grew up hearing women that "it doesn't matter how much money he makes or where he works, just as LONG as he has a job". Bullshit. I know these movies are just scripts and not actual life, but I've seen too many people around me live out what is in these movies and I REFUSE to be treated like a lie-about in the face of someone who doesn't appreciate me for my virtue and consistency as a good man. Sure, I'm going to be a billionaire eventually, but what about right now and how I've been received by women now versus when I was making very good money both from the job and from side business hustles, driving the 350Z, wearing the nicest clothes, shopping, traveling, fine dining -- and when all that ran out when I returned to school; to have some do a 180 on a DIME solely because the money wasn't flowing anymore. That goes to show the "it doesn't matter how much he has, just as long as he is a good, honest, hard-working man" line is utter hogwash.
Good day.
M.D. Wright
4.26.09
I'm going to try to keep this brief. I want to review two movies that I have watched the past two nights and then tie in some things that I have encountered both in the recent past and throughout my 20s (as I recount).
Last night, I was hanging with a good friend and we went to see "Obsessed" (along with "Earth", for my class -- but that is immaterial in this post). I had seen the trailer and previews, so I pretty much knew the basic premise of the movie before going in. I do not have a high opinion of Beyoncé on the big screen, but I went in with an open mind, rather than having it made up to rip her as some of the reviewers did. However, I did find myself saying "expected" and turning to my friend as I had flashbacks to being stalked back in the day.
I won't spoil the movie, so I won't delve into the plot and specifics. Nevertheless, two things really bugged me all throughout this movie (and the other one that I will briefly touch upon): the idea that 1) White women are stone crazy about Black men and will go to any lengths to land one and 2) These movies don't do anything to erase the stereotype that Black women have bad attitudes -- which are many times, uncalled for.
Side note: Beyoncé actually did a pretty good job in this role.
Ali Larter, who played the stalker/psycho in the movie also had a hand in perpetuating a common stereotype of White women that is floating around nowadays: "they are only after Black men for sexual escapades and nothing more". Whatever. Just like all Black women don't have nasty attitudes. Generalizations just do not work. I sat with my friend (Black female) and immediately next to two 20-something White females who squirmed and winced when touchy scenes passed by. Of course, this particular theatre was packed with hoodrats who were just there to see "B." whoop someone's ass and that's it. Even when Beyoncé's character was out of line for not believing her husband (played by Idris Elba), I said "expected", but at the same time, I would have loved to have seen her keep her composure instead of reacting "typically".
By the way, for anyone who has already seen the movie, does anyone find it ODD that Beyoncé refers to their home as HER house when I ain't seen her work a minute in this movie. DEAR GOD.
Segue.
The same with "Not Easily Broken". The movie started kind of slow, and it was very good throughout. But after one of the kids' passes away, his mother, played by a single White mother, began putting the subtle moves on the Black woman's father. The expected ensued. But this is when I began to think to myself: WHAT IS THE PROBLEM HERE...? Where did this disconnect REALLY TRULY stem from?
I get tired of hearing Black women talk about "well, we're so accustomed to so and so and how they approach/treat us" as an excuse for acting the way they generally do. For those to whom this does not apply, you know not to get upset. If you get upset by what I say, then it applies to you.
Why, if "women's intuition" is so REAL, can't women truly tell a sincere man apart from one who is "just like all the others"? It's all BS. They know the difference. And given that fact, why am I being made to pay for the mistakes of others? Do I pop off and treat every woman I meet as a "bitch" because most of the women I've dealt with or entered into relationships with were slimy, reptilian, bloodsucking, selfish golddiggers who only cared about what they could get from me? No. Everyone gets a clean slate. And enough of the "well, we're so accustomed to our fathers, brothers, uncles not being there, so we have to be the men in the family". Okay, true, the Black community has its ills. That is one that is well-chronicled. HOWEVER, know when to put that BS on the back burner. When you are dealing with a man to whom that does not apply, cease and desist with the balderdash excuses to act like an ass. PERIOD. End of discussion. I'm sick of it.
But back to my main point about "Not Easily Broken", there are two trends playing out in the 2000s that are severely disturbing to me. First, the whole "Miss Independent"/"Got My Own" phenomena. Rubbish. Women who talk like that get defriended off my friends' list on Facebook and summarily dismissed. NO ONE IS AN ISLAND; and trying to prove one's worth to spite an entire gender is just foolish. Just because you've CHOSEN (key word) to deal with a bunch of sloughs doesn't mean you need to parade around and tell the world how much you don't need a man. He doesn't NEED you either, but he WANTS you (and I don't mean the slouch ass niggas, either). God created us to relate with one another and feed, serve, help and support one another physically and spiritually, not to flaunt our material rubbish around as a show of one's own efficiencies. How UNattractive is it to hear a woman banter about this, even if she does have her own things and doesn't need a man to provide them for her? What do you want me to do, provide a drummer's rim shot for you? Goodness gracious sakes alive, enough with this nonsense already.
My other thought about this point is the by-product of all this: the "me-first" (second, third and twentieth) mentality about marriage, children and so forth. Not all women are cut out to be housewives. Indeed, housewives have TOUGH lives; but it is not demeaning (no matter what brainless feminist zealots have led many to believe) or beneath one to do so. On the contrary, God made nurturing both children and the family unit as a whole such a noble thing that ONLY a woman is equipped to properly do so. Think about that. How is it that something God deems the highest of NOBILITY all of a sudden regarded as beneath or less-than? And please save the "you don't understand patriarchal society and the history of male oppression". Bullshit. I'm a Sociologist. Don't go there.
My thing is, in this movie, this woman was all about her career, trying to be something she's not, living above her means and trying to make people think things about her that were more lofty than they actually were. Who wants to be with someone like that? If you say yes, defriend me. NOW.
She didn't want to have a child because it would "get in the way of her career". WHAT.
Meanwhile, because her husband decided to... get this... GIVE BACK TO THE YOUTH BY COACHING, he's a less-than and also-ran who is worthless to her. Here we go. A social-climber, me-first, all about her career and status type who will run off a PERFECTLY good man (with a nasty attitude to boot) because he's not trying to keep up with the mythical Joneses.
One thing that I did like about her character (played by Taraji P. Henson) is that she redeems herself by doing something MANY women do not do (and drive me nuts by doing so; including some from my own personal past) and that's ADMITTING that she was wrong. That was like the icing on the cake, the cherry on top and putting the jello in the fridge (as Chick Hearn used to say) for me. A guy can be 100% sincere and honest, but if he's with a woman who never admits when she's wrong, 9 times out of 10 he's going to cheat or she's going to leave him for Joe Social Climber the 3rd. My problem with this generation of women (to whom this applies, not the ones who have it figured out and know whether they're supposed to be in the corporate arena because they've been called to do it and not those who do it just to compete with men and try to one up their OWN boyfriends/husbands -- that shit is BEYOND annoying) is that everything is about job prestige, money/wealth, status and material possessions. I grew up hearing women that "it doesn't matter how much money he makes or where he works, just as LONG as he has a job". Bullshit. I know these movies are just scripts and not actual life, but I've seen too many people around me live out what is in these movies and I REFUSE to be treated like a lie-about in the face of someone who doesn't appreciate me for my virtue and consistency as a good man. Sure, I'm going to be a billionaire eventually, but what about right now and how I've been received by women now versus when I was making very good money both from the job and from side business hustles, driving the 350Z, wearing the nicest clothes, shopping, traveling, fine dining -- and when all that ran out when I returned to school; to have some do a 180 on a DIME solely because the money wasn't flowing anymore. That goes to show the "it doesn't matter how much he has, just as long as he is a good, honest, hard-working man" line is utter hogwash.
Good day.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
